Monday, August 19, 2013

Spotify Versus Pandora: Which Is Better?

Pandora logo image
Most people that have switched to streaming music use either Spotify or Pandora. That may change in a month or so when iRadio comes to life, but right now both companies hold the lead in the streaming part of the business. But which one is better? Here's a quick comparison.

Spotify: available in 21 countries
Pandora: available in 3 countries

Spotify: 20 million active users
Pandora: 47 million active users

Spotify: 20 million songs
Pandora: 1 million songs

Spotify: users can search for specific songs
Pandora: users refine their favorite channels with "thumbs up" or "thumbs down"

Spotify:after 6 months for free, users are limited to 10 hours per month
Pandora: basic music app is free, but with ads

Spotify: users can create custom playlists
Pandora: suggests songs so you can discover new music

Spotify: integrates with Facebook so users find new music based on friend's recommendations
Pandora: rewind and repeat not possible

So who's the winner? There's pros and cons with both, but there's enough cons that both are open to some competition. With a lot of that soon coming from some heavy hitters in the business, it's no doubt that the streaming landscape will be different by this time next year.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Sunday, August 18, 2013

Mobile Music Booms

Here's an interesting infographic about the state of mobile music today.

As you can see, 31% of all smartphone users stream music, and 79% of them are listening to Pandora!

The other interesting thing is that the US is only #5 in smartphone users listening to music, behind China, Russia, South Korea and Brazil. We use our phones for a lot more than communicating these days.

----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Can Kid Rock's $20 Ticket Change The Concert Business?

Kid Rock image
Kid Rock has gone completely against the grain of the concert industry by touring behind the idea that a cheap ticket makes more money than an expensive one in the long run. While the average ticket price across the industry is almost $80, Rock has decided that $20 is more in range with what he'd like to see his fans pay.

Rock got promoter LiveNation to buy in after he agreed to revenue share 50/50 on the proceeds, rather than ask for a guarantee like most artists, and so far it's paid off, as every show has sold out and multiple nights have been booked at the same venues. And it gets better than just the low ticket price for fans.

  • Walmart offers the tickets with no additional fees. You pay a flat 20 bucks.
  • Parking is included in the price of the ticket
  • Beer is $4
  • Tour shirts are also $20 (they're usually at least $30 to 40 for most artists)
  • Free samples of Jimmy John's sandwiches at the venue
  • Free coffee available at the end of the show.

Now there are a thousand premium tickets available at higher prices, but they're also being sold directly to fans to keep the scalpers at bay.

This is a great idea because not only does it expose Rock to potential new fans who can afford to check him out because of the cheap prices, but it reenergizes his fan base as well. There's nothing like seeing a great live show to get your fans talking, and buying.

Not wanting to sound too old school here, once upon a time concerts were cheap enough that you could go several times a week and still have money left over. That exposed you to music that you'd have never seen otherwise, and allowed you to make a musical connection in the best way possible - from a live event. Unfortunately, as the prices began to soar, that several times a week became several times a month to today's once or twice a year. There's no way to gain new fans since the artists are only playing to their hard core fan base.

Kid Rock's lower prices have already caused a stir in the business, as Bon Jovi has added a $19.50 ticket to the current tour and other acts are considering something similar as well. This is a healthy trend and good for everyone involved, at least as long as the venues are full. Let's hope it continues.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Beats Music Launch Getting Closer

beats Music logo image
Dr. Dre and Jimmy Iovine's Beats "Project Daisy" streaming music service appears to be getting closer to reality. Not only does Beats Music now have a website (although there's nothing on it), but it's hired a number of high profile people as music "curators." It's also openly advertising for engineers and designers.

According to Billboard, among the new hires include:
   Scott Plagenhoef, former Pitchfork Media editor in chief
   Carl Chery, former digital content director at XXL
   Suzy Cole, a radio music director from Detroit
   Arjan Writes, Recording Academy music blogger
   Mason Williams, former Rhino Records A&R director
   Fuzzy Fantabulous, LA hip hop radio personality
   Ken Tucker, a country music writer

They all report to new hire Julie Pilat, a former top exec at Clear Channel.

As I've posted before, the big hook for the new service will be content curation, which Iovine believes is something missing from the other services. The human element promises to provide a better way to discover new music, something that's not only vital for the service but the music industry in general.

The new curators certainly are experienced in their genres, which is a good place to start. Whether high profile and experienced curators will be better than ordinary people steeped in their particular scene is yet to be determined, but it's a good place to start.

There's no date for the launch of Beats Music (or Project Daisy, or whatever it will be called), but it looks like it's not that far away now.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Aimee Mann Sues An Invisible Distributor

Aimee Mann image
While a variety of high profile artists like Thom Yorke, Nigel Godrich and Pink Floyd are all railing against the perceived royalty injustice at the hands of streaming music services like Spotify, singer-songwriter Aimee Mann has taken a different tact in her new lawsuit against a low profile company called MediaNet. Mann claims that the company has been using more than a hundred of her songs while not paying her any royalties in a suit which could add up to as much $18 million in statutory damages.
Everyone is by now very familiar with Spotify, Pandora, Rdio, Slacker and all the other streaming services that seem to be constantly in the news, but not many can say they know anything about MediaNet. (Check out the rest of the article on Forbes).
----------------------------------

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Monday, August 12, 2013

A Like As Positive Reinforcement

The Like Button image
A new study has found that if an article or post if Liked on a site like Facebook or Reddit, new readers are more likely to approve of it. This is from a study published Science journal that says that Likes create a "herding" effect in that it makes other readers more likely to react the same way.

This seems like a pretty obvious conclusion, but sometimes the obvious needs real data behind it for verification, which is what this study did. Another thing that the study revealed is that negative views don't seem to have the same impact on readers, meaning that people aren't more likely to follow that trend if it's presented.

On an unnamed news aggregation site, the researchers manipulated the ratings of over 100,000 comments on the site. They found that the ones that got the positive boosts received an average of 25 percent higher ratings as a result.

The conclusion they drew was that Likes perform a sort of positive reinforcement for readers. If someone else Likes something, then it's safe for them to Like it as well. If there are few Likes, then there's less comfort in doing so.

That said, other studies have found that Likes are a function of the number of followers or readers that you might have, where a level of 1% is a good result. In other words, if you have 1,000 followers, you can expect as many as 10 Likes on certain posts, and far less on most others.

It just goes to show that you shouldn't overvalue those Likes.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Sunday, August 11, 2013

When Vocalists Don't Get Paid

There's a long list of hits going back to the 50s that used a different singer other than the artist that was credited on the record. The most famous of these may be Milli Vanilli in the late 80s, who when discovered, were forced to give back their Grammy. This actually caused a law to be introduced in the US making it mandatory to credit the correct vocalists on the recording in the aftermath.

But dance music has always been different, since many times a track is already complete when the vocalists is brought in. It's then up to the singer to complete the song by writing the lyrics and melody. The problem is that many times, even today, these co-writers don't get any royalties for what they've done. Case in point is singer Martha Wash on C+C Music Factory's big hit "Gonna Make You Sweat," who eventually resorted to suing the label to get proper credit and royalties.

Now one singer has had enough. Vocalist Antonia Lucas, after 20 years singing and writing on hits without credit or royalties, has started the Vocalist Songwriters Alliance (VSA). Lucas has found that the the problem has become more acute in today's EDM world, where the real singer of the song is usually replaced by a younger and prettier "singer" on the video, and therefore becomes the star artist. VSA is just trying to bring some equality to the situation. You do the work, you should get paid.

VSA now has over 300 members, and some of them are very impressive. Check out their site and the video below.

----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

MixBit: 16 Second Social Video

Mixbit logo image
There's a new social video service in town and it's name is Mixbit, an app that lets you mash-up videos from as many as 256 sources. Already available for iOS, an Android version is also in the works, and the web version just went live.

The app was developed by old hands at online video, Chad Hurley and Steve Chen. If those names sound familiar it's because they were the co-founders of YouTube, which they sold to Google in 2005.

Mixbit is a little like Vine (6 seconds) and Viddy (30 seconds) in that each finished clip is limited in time, with Mixbit being 16 seconds long. People are able to combine either their own source material or use clips that are shared publicly.

16 seconds doesn't sound like much but it's been proven in various studies that people's attention span during videos is shortening all the time, and it's rare that most people will watch one in it's entirety, especially if it's over a minute. 16 seconds may be a magic number where the viewer will commit even if there's a possibility that they might not like it, where that's rare if the video is long enough where he has to wait for a payoff.

For a band, Mixbit is cool in that your fans can make short mashups of your videos or pictures and provide a a sample of your songs. It a bite-sized way for people to get a feel for your music.

All of these social video apps have a ways to go before they're in the same league as YouTube or even some YouTube competitors like Vimeo or DailyMotion, but Hurley and Chen have the experience and presumably the money to jump out in front. Let's check back in 6 months and see what happens.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Spotify Launches A Browse Feature

Spotify Browse feature image
Spotify has long been criticized about its minimal way of searching for music. In an effort to music discovery easier, the service has introduced a new feature it calls "Browse," which is specifically designed to point users to music they might like.

Browse is a list of suggested playlists grouped by context and mood that are curated by real humans, not algorithms. This is a big change in that most music services try to build suggestions based around an algorithm that measures what you listen to. That has left big gaps in the useful suggestions, leading to a great deal of criticism by industry leaders and how ineffective these features really are.

It appears that Spotify's purchase of the music discovery startup Tunigo earlier this year brought in the necessary elements for it to be able to launch Browse.

What's interesting here is that Beats Jimmy Iovine has been a major critic of current streaming services, and claimed his upcoming Daisy music service would be the first to feature real people curating the songs on a service. Now it looks like Spotify has beaten them to the punch, although it's too early to tell just how well they will perform the task.

That being said, every streaming music service is now aware that human curation is a necessary element, if for no other reason than the competition will have it. It will be up to each to prove they can execute the feature well, but it can only mean an useful improvement for the listener in the end.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

The Turtles Sue SiriusXM For $100 Mil

The Turtles image
If you're like me and like to occasionally sample some of the songs of the 50s, 60s, and 70s on SiriusXM, you may soon find that option no longer available thanks to a $100 million class-action lawsuit brought about by the 60s band The Turtles.

The Turtles had a number of big hits back then that get regular airplay on the Sirius 60s On 6 channel like "Happy Together," "It Ain't Me Babe," and "She'd Rather Be With Me," but the band feels that SiriusXM has not paid adequate royalties on these and thousands of other songs that date before 1972.

On February 15, 1972 all recordings began being protected by paragraph 114 of the Copyright Act, which provides limitations on exclusive rights and spells out the way that artist's are compensated. Unfortunately the law is somewhat murky on what happens with songs before that point, and The Turtles (Flo & Eddie - Mark Volman and Howard Kaylan) feel that Sirius has overstepped their bounds in that regard.

While millions of dollars are a big part of the picture, what might be even bigger is that the suit also seeks an injunction to prohibit any pre-1972 songs to be played on SiriusXM until the suit is settled. That would be a shame, since it sure is fun to hear some of the old songs.

Just for the record, Mark Volman is now an associate professor and director of the entertainment industry studies program at Belmont University, where I have spoken at in the past.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Monday, August 5, 2013

Radio And Streaming Show Different Song Popularity

Both streaming and digital song sales are up this year (downloads by 4% and streaming 24%), which is a good thing, but some interesting new data shows that there's a big difference between the top songs that radio plays and the most streamed songs.

The reason why this is important is that sales come more as a result of radio play, who's playlist is controlled by consultants and program directors, while streaming is based more on the actual popularity of the song or artist. Here's what the comparison looks like, according to Nielsen and Billboard.

nielsen billboard 2013

While radio isn't going away by any stretch of the imagination, you have to wonder how its playlists will be affected in the future as streaming increases. With so much of music radio programmed by consultants who are one step removed by the public, perhaps they'll be forced to watch the streaming charts more closely when it comes to choosing songs. Whether they do or not, radio will be changing in future thanks to streaming, you can bet on it.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

Sunday, August 4, 2013

6 Steps To Resolving A Band Conflict

Conflict image
One of the most difficult things in life is to keep everyone happy in a band. In most situations, you're playing together because of the music that you collectively make, not because you're friends. That can lead to a number of personality clashes that will need to be resolved, or else you'll find the band folding right before your eyes. Here's an excerpt from How To Make Your Band Sound Great (the band improvement book) that covers the 6 steps in resolving a band conflict.

"Being in any relationship requires at least some compromise and a band is no different from what you’d expect between family, friends, girlfriends, boyfriends, wives, husbands, bosses and co-workers.  There are times where you just have to bend in order to keep the peace.  

While compromise is easy for some people, others have a personality that would never allow it and a conflict occurs. Here are some effective steps that you can take to state your case in a way that should resolve the conflict.

1. Cool off first - Conflicts can’t be solved when emotions are running hot. Take some time to get away from the problem for a bit and brainstorm on exactly what the problem is, how it was caused, and most important, a possible solution.

2. Present accolades, support and respect - The first thing to do is acknowledge the person’s accomplishments and talent. Something like, “I want to start by saying that I think the band has never been better since you joined and the parts that you’re singing are way better than I ever expected.”  

3. Analysis of why the problem occurred - If you give a clear explanation of why you think there’s a problem or why the problem or conflict has occurred, you set the initial groundwork for solving the conflict. If the other person knows exactly what your side of the story is, you might find more often than not that you’re both on the same page, but on different sides of it.

4. Take responsibility and use “I” messages - If you have a part in a conflict that you’re aware of, take responsibility and own up to it, but make sure that everything is from your point of view. For instance, it’s best to say, “I think you were really flat on that part,” rather than “Everybody knows that you always sing that part flat,” or worse, “You’re singing sucks, man.”

5. Describe what I or we need so the problem doesn’t happen again - This is the solution from your point of view. “We really need you to be here ten minutes before rehearsal so you have time to set up. That way we can get our full rehearsal in, which we really need right now.”


6. Support their success - Tell him that you want him to win to, because if he wins, so do you. “The better you sound, the better we all sound,” or “Do you know how great we’re going to sound once you get that part down? We’re going to kill!”

To read additional excerpts from How To Make Your Band Sound Great and other books, go to the excerpt section of bobbyowsinski.com.
----------------------------------

Follow me on Forbes for some insights on the new music business.

You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.

Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...