Three undergrads from Tufts University have launched a new app that's catching on like wildfire. It's called Cymbal, and many have called it the "Instagram of Music" because of its less-is-more user interface.
Cymbal describes itself as "music powered by friends, not algorithms." That's because users are allowed to share just one song at a time along with album art.
The whole idea is that the user gets to post that one song that's most important in their life at that moment.
Like Instagram, Cymbal uses a home feed, personal profile, followers, likes, comments, hashtags and tags.
You can share tracks from Soundcloud or Spotify, and since it was created from the ground up as an iOS app (an Android version is coming), it's perfectly at home where more and more do their listening - via the phone.
There's less than a million users at the moment, but the app seems to be coming on strong, so look out for more about Cymbal in the future.
Help Support This Blog
Friday, September 11, 2015
Thursday, September 10, 2015
Artists Not Buying In To Apple Connect
![]() |
3 Artists on Apple Music Connect |
Music Alley took a close look at Connect and came up with a number of interesting facts. For instance:
- Artists that do post only post weekly, if that.
- Many posts are just recycled Twitter, Instagram or Facebook posts.
- Social maven Taylor Swift (who's seemingly everywhere) doesn't even have a Connect presence yet.
Apple doesn't do social well and it looks like Connect is headed the way of Ping (if you remember that). One problem is that artists and their social media managers have their hands full with too many options already. They don't need another one.Shakira (2)Eminem (6)Rihanna (not on Connect)Michael Jackson (not on Connect)Bob Marley (1)Justin Bieber (6)Taylor Swift (not on Connect)Katy Perry (not on Connect)Beyoncé (not on Connect)Linkin Park (10)Lady Gaga (11)Adele (not on Connect)Pitbull (22)Bruno Mars (not on Connect)Selena Gomez (6)David Guetta (12)Avril Lavigne (3)Akon (not on Connect)Lil Wayne (not on Connect)Enrique Iglesias (9)
Wednesday, September 9, 2015
Record Label In A Box
I don't know if it's a good idea or not to start your own label, but if do and you're in the UK, then Record Label In A Box from the music aggregator Ditto Music could be for you.
The Basic edition goes for £99 ($152), the Premium edition is £249 ($383), and the Enterprise version costs a whopping £3499 ($5,378). The latter features a 12 month mentoring, one-on-one career building, and a full PR and marketing campaign and a branded website.
You can check it out on the Ditto website, but just remember that most of what they show you applies to the UK.
The Basic edition goes for £99 ($152), the Premium edition is £249 ($383), and the Enterprise version costs a whopping £3499 ($5,378). The latter features a 12 month mentoring, one-on-one career building, and a full PR and marketing campaign and a branded website.
You can check it out on the Ditto website, but just remember that most of what they show you applies to the UK.
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Mastering Engineer Colin Leonard On My Latest Inner Circle Podcast
This week's guest on my Inner Circle Podcast is mastering engineer Colin Leonard of Sing Mastering, who's become the go-to mastering guy for uber-mixers like Dave Pensado and Phil Tan. Colin describes how he got into mastering, his unusual and proprietary signal path, and his overall mastering philosophy.
On the intro we'll look at what's becoming known as "Playola," or the practice of paying to be included on an influential playlist, as well as maybe getting an answer to the perennial question "What is the best driving music?".
Also, I'm happy to announce that the podcast has been selected as one of the Top 10 music industry podcasts by Indie Connect.
On the intro we'll look at what's becoming known as "Playola," or the practice of paying to be included on an influential playlist, as well as maybe getting an answer to the perennial question "What is the best driving music?".
Also, I'm happy to announce that the podcast has been selected as one of the Top 10 music industry podcasts by Indie Connect.
Pinning Your Tweets For More Attention
There are times when you post a tweet that's so important that you want as many of your followers to see it as possible for as long as possible. There's a way to take that tweet and push it to the top of your profile where it will stay even after subsequent tweets. This is known as "pinning" a tweet.
Here's how to do it.
1. Select the tweet that you would like to pin.
2. Click the three dots (...) next to "View Tweet Activity" beneath your tweet.
3. Click "Pin to your profile post" in the dialog box.
Refresh your screen to make sure that the pin appears at the top of your profile.
Pinned tweets are not reposted; they're just pushed to the top and will stay there until you unpin them.
What should you pin? How about:
Here's how to do it.
1. Select the tweet that you would like to pin.
2. Click the three dots (...) next to "View Tweet Activity" beneath your tweet.
3. Click "Pin to your profile post" in the dialog box.
Refresh your screen to make sure that the pin appears at the top of your profile.
Pinned tweets are not reposted; they're just pushed to the top and will stay there until you unpin them.
What should you pin? How about:
- a tweet about a new release or video
- a tweet about an upcoming gig
- a question that you've asked your followers
- a great photo
- an old tweet that you'd like to revive without tweeting again
Monday, September 7, 2015
Google Trying To Finally Kill Flash
It hasn't been a good idea to use Flash animation on your website for a long time, and it looks like Google is finally trying to put the final nail in the coffin.
Goggle's Chrome browser now automatically pauses any web ads that use Flash. Ads that use the newer HTML5 will continue to work as always, as that's the favored format.
It's been recommended here for quite some time that Flash wasn't something that you wanted to use. First of all, anything iOS doesn't recognize it, so all those iPhone and iPad users never were able to access it.
From a website design perspective, Flash animation died a long time ago. Opening splash pages with lots of animation used to be all the rage but now look very last century.
Worse of all, Flash is a battery hog that compromises the security of your operating system. It's just not cut out for our new mobile world.
That said, advertisers still continue to favor Flash because most of the creative people at ad agencies everywhere grew with Adobe Creative Suite, of which Flash is a part of. HTML5 is more flexible, but it's not as designer friendly.
It looks like this move by Google will now force agency designers to make the switch.
So rejoice that there's one less vestige of the online past as Flash slowly passes into the night.
Goggle's Chrome browser now automatically pauses any web ads that use Flash. Ads that use the newer HTML5 will continue to work as always, as that's the favored format.
It's been recommended here for quite some time that Flash wasn't something that you wanted to use. First of all, anything iOS doesn't recognize it, so all those iPhone and iPad users never were able to access it.
From a website design perspective, Flash animation died a long time ago. Opening splash pages with lots of animation used to be all the rage but now look very last century.
Worse of all, Flash is a battery hog that compromises the security of your operating system. It's just not cut out for our new mobile world.
That said, advertisers still continue to favor Flash because most of the creative people at ad agencies everywhere grew with Adobe Creative Suite, of which Flash is a part of. HTML5 is more flexible, but it's not as designer friendly.
It looks like this move by Google will now force agency designers to make the switch.
So rejoice that there's one less vestige of the online past as Flash slowly passes into the night.
Friday, September 4, 2015
What’s Really Behind Pandora’s Ad-Free Day
Pandora has announced that it will celebrate it’s 10th anniversary on Wednesday September 9th with a day that’s free of ads for its freemium tier. While many will look at what’s being called “Listener Love Day” as a nice gesture to celebrate a decade in business, there may be more to it than meets the eye.
While a day without ads might give Pandora’s freemium listeners (who make up 95% of its active users) a sample of what the premium paid-subscriber tier is like, it can also be viewed as an all-out effort to get at least some of those users to finally buy in.
Pandora currently has about 250 million subscribers but only 80 million are active, according to the company’s own numbers. Of those, just around 4 million, or 5%, have chosen the $4.99 per month ad-free premium tier (and many of them subscribed at the previous $3.99 level). This ratio has been surprisingly steady throughout its history, and the service hasn’t proven that it has the ability to up the conversion rate.
What’s even more out of balance is that those 5% of paid subscribers are responsible for just over 20% of Pandora’s revenue for the first half of 2015, according to the company’s Q2 financial statement.
In comparison, Spotify has around 75 million users and about 20 million are subscribed to the paid tier, which is more than 26% of active users. Those subscribers are also willing to pay twice as much at $9.99 per month. Read more on Forbes.
Labels:
Forbes,
freemium,
paid subscribers,
Pandora
Thursday, September 3, 2015
A New Find Could Push The "Happy Birthday" Song Into The Public Domain
If you ever wondered why the "Happy Birthday To You" song that you grew up with is often replaced with some lame version in restaurants, television and movies, it's because the song isn't in the public domain. Its copyright is owned by Warner/Chappell Music, which collects about $2 million a year in royalties from its use.
There have been numerous lawsuits over the years claiming that Warner/Chappell didn't actually own the copyright, but all were defeated. But some new recently discovered evidence might turn the tide the other way and return the song to the public domain.
A librarian at the University of Louisville found the only known copy of "Good Morning To All," the song written by Louisville natives Mildred and Patty Hill and published in a children's book in 1893. The manuscript for the book was donated to the library in the 1950s but not cataloged.
Warner/Chappell acquired what it believed to be the copyright of "Happy Birthday To You" when it acquired the Clayton F. Summy Company in 1935. The company has aggressively defended its ownership of the song's copyright ever since.
A class action suit by a group of filmmakers, artists and musicians filed in 2013 claims that the song has been in the public domain all the while, and has asked that all the royalties collected by Warner/Chappell be returned. The new find in the Louisville library should add some weight to their claim.
It would be nice to have "Happy Birthday" back in the public domain, if for no other reason than to prevent hearing those bad substitutions ever again.
There have been numerous lawsuits over the years claiming that Warner/Chappell didn't actually own the copyright, but all were defeated. But some new recently discovered evidence might turn the tide the other way and return the song to the public domain.
A librarian at the University of Louisville found the only known copy of "Good Morning To All," the song written by Louisville natives Mildred and Patty Hill and published in a children's book in 1893. The manuscript for the book was donated to the library in the 1950s but not cataloged.
Warner/Chappell acquired what it believed to be the copyright of "Happy Birthday To You" when it acquired the Clayton F. Summy Company in 1935. The company has aggressively defended its ownership of the song's copyright ever since.
A class action suit by a group of filmmakers, artists and musicians filed in 2013 claims that the song has been in the public domain all the while, and has asked that all the royalties collected by Warner/Chappell be returned. The new find in the Louisville library should add some weight to their claim.
It would be nice to have "Happy Birthday" back in the public domain, if for no other reason than to prevent hearing those bad substitutions ever again.
Labels:
copyright,
Happy Birthday song,
Warner/Chappell
Wednesday, September 2, 2015
Are Vinyl Records Headed For The Supermarket?
In what may be a fascinating turn of events, it looks like you may see some vinyl records for sales along with the tabloid papers in the checkout line of you local supermarket before long.
The UK's biggest supermarket chain, Tesco, is going to stock vinyl later this week in a special promotion with Iron Maiden and their first studio record in five years, The Book of Souls.
This is a triple album on Warner's Parlophone label, which is interesting in itself in the Maiden were DIY without a label for a number of years.
This is considered to be a trial run that could see the supermarket chain commit to more vinyl titles and inventory if it goes well.
No doubt supermarket chains in the US are watching this one closely.
The UK's biggest supermarket chain, Tesco, is going to stock vinyl later this week in a special promotion with Iron Maiden and their first studio record in five years, The Book of Souls.
This is a triple album on Warner's Parlophone label, which is interesting in itself in the Maiden were DIY without a label for a number of years.
This is considered to be a trial run that could see the supermarket chain commit to more vinyl titles and inventory if it goes well.
No doubt supermarket chains in the US are watching this one closely.
Labels:
Iron Maiden,
Parolophone,
supermarket chains,
Tesco,
vinyl records
Tuesday, September 1, 2015
Why Ian Roger’s Departure From Apple Music Puts It In A Bad Place
It’s been reported today that Apple Music executive Ian Rogers has left the company to pursue other interests in an “unrelated industry.” That bodes ill for Apple as Rogers was the operational brains behind both Beats Music and its transition to Apple Music.
Rogers has been a long-time digital music insider, having run Beats Music, Topspin (a direct to consumer marketplace for artists and bands) and Yahoo Music. He’s also one of the smartest and level-headed guys in an industry with a dearth of those attributes.
It’s been long speculated that Rogers was a key ingredient in Apple’s acquisition of Beats. Jimmy Iovine may be a vaunted music exec, but he’s been compared to a New York street hustler by many that have done business with him through the years. Dr. Dre is great producer, but he’s seen as a marketing foil for Iovine. Together they were able to turn some cheap Chinese headphones into gold thanks to a licensing deal with Monster Cable, then flip it for a huge profit to Apple.
Rogers was the guy behind the scenes that quietly created the Beats Music service, which was always going to be limited because of the Beats brand and its tie-in with the headphones. He had his finger on the market and the down-in-the-trenches everyday music consumer much more so than Iovine or Dre ever did, and that’s one of the reasons why Apple bought the company. He was just the kind of guy they needed to run the next iteration of iTunes.
I had the pleasure of hearing Rogers speak many times and even interviewed him for a previous edition of my book Music 4.0: A Survival Guide For Making Music In The Internet Age. I always came away much more enlightened than before, both in local and global views of the music market. Ian knew his customers very well, the tools they were using, and the music they were listening to. Read more on Forbes.
Labels:
Apple Music,
Beats Music,
Dr. Dre,
Forbes,
Ian Rogers,
Jimmy Iovine
Monday, August 31, 2015
Facebook Finally Cracking Down On Video Pirates
Facebook has really been pushing its video service as a real challenge to YouTube, but it's failed in a couple of big areas - monetization and piracy. Now it looks like the service is finally rolling out a system to at least take care of the pirates.
On YouTube, if someone is using your video or music without permission, a technology known as Content ID sniffs it out and notifies the copyright holder. The channel using the video or song without permission is then given 2 choices - either taking the video down or allowing advertising to be placed on the video, of which most of the income will go to the content owner.
This is how money is made on YouTube. Not so much on the video you post, but on the many others that repost it virally.
Unfortunately Facebook hasn't had any method of doing that - until now.
The service is rolling out what it calls a "video matching technology" that will let content owners tell Facebook that a video clip belongs to them.
This is an important first step to monetization, which is crucial if Facebook wants to give YouTube a run for its money.
Facebook says that it now fields more than 4 billion daily video views, but some estimate that as many as 70% are videos that were illegally lifted from YouTube. Now there's a way for the original posters to begin to take advantage of what Facebook has to offer.
On YouTube, if someone is using your video or music without permission, a technology known as Content ID sniffs it out and notifies the copyright holder. The channel using the video or song without permission is then given 2 choices - either taking the video down or allowing advertising to be placed on the video, of which most of the income will go to the content owner.
This is how money is made on YouTube. Not so much on the video you post, but on the many others that repost it virally.
Unfortunately Facebook hasn't had any method of doing that - until now.
The service is rolling out what it calls a "video matching technology" that will let content owners tell Facebook that a video clip belongs to them.
This is an important first step to monetization, which is crucial if Facebook wants to give YouTube a run for its money.
Facebook says that it now fields more than 4 billion daily video views, but some estimate that as many as 70% are videos that were illegally lifted from YouTube. Now there's a way for the original posters to begin to take advantage of what Facebook has to offer.
Labels:
Content ID,
Facebook,
Facebook video,
video matching technology,
YouTube
Friday, August 28, 2015
3 Ways To Discover New Hashtags
![]() |
Hashtagify.me |
1. Hashtagify.me. This is one of my favorites. Just search for a hashtag and Hashtagify.me will show you its popularity as well as other connected keywords and their relevancy (see the graphic on the left). It also shows the latest trending hashtags, influencers who use the hashtag, and the latest tweets.
2. Topsy. Topsy is a great tool to check on the popularity of a hashtag. It will give you the number of people who have used it in a tweet in increments from a day to a month as well as a sentiment score. There's also a trends chart so you can see if there are certain days when the hashtag seems to be working the best.
3. Twitter Advanced Search. I've always been big on a basic Twitter search at search.twitter.com, but its Advanced Search takes it to the next level. It allows you to zero in on a keyword phrase, a URL, a person, place or date and see the latest trends and tweets.
The next time you're going to post anything that uses a hashtag, check it out on a couple of these sites to see how powerful it is or find an alternative. It could mean the difference between someone reading your post or not.
Labels:
hashtagify.me,
hashtags,
Topsy,
Twitter,
Twitter Advanced Search
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)