Apple Corps announced today that
The Beatles have sold 450,000 digital albums and 2 million digital singles worldwide in the first week that they've been available on
iTunes. On the surface these look like fantastic numbers, but dig a little deeper and you see that they're not what they seem.
First of all, 450k albums in the opening week should nowadays be great for any artist, let alone a band from 40 years ago. But this figure is not for one album, it's for 13, which tempers the numbers a great deal. Then the fact that these are
worldwide figures tempers the figure even more. Only 119k of these album sales were from the US, which is much less than I would've anticipated.
As a comparison,
Take That sold more than 520,000 of their new
Progress album last week in the UK alone. In the US,
Abbey Road came in at #6 (at only 16,000 sales) and
The Beatles Box Set came in at #10 for the week, behind the likes of
Rhianna and the cast of
Glee.
"
Here Comes The Sun" was the most purchased Beatle's single, but only came in at #54 while "
Let It Be" ranked #60.
Bottom line, despite the numbers, this was a tremendous marketing failure for both iTunes and
EMI, the band's distributor. If they would've released the albums incrementally instead of all at once, they would've kept the momentum going over a longer period of time, made each album release an event, and sold more product in the long run. In the end, they violated one of the main rules of
Music 3.0 - Release more product more often. But then again, what do you expect from the epitome of the "old school" music business.
-----------------------------------