Want to impress the press with a large crowd of screaming fans? How about having a big crowd for a video shoot? Maybe you want to impress a club owner with a big turnout?
All the above scenarios are possible (if you have the money) by using a company called Crowds On Demand.
Hiring a fake crowd may seem like cheating on some level, but it's actually been done for years. Going back as far as Elvis and The Beatles, management inserted ringers into every television audience to make the reaction larger than life. Yes, it worked very well indeed.
It might cost you $5,000, but if it pumps up the publicity machine the cost could be well worth it.
Many companies that have used Crowds On Demand for everything from fake protests to screaming fans at the airport, and have reported getting enough free publicity as a result to be worth the cost many times over.
The problem of course is that you need the money and the campaign strategy to make the utmost use of your fake crowd, something that most artists and bands find out of reach.
Still, if you're heading up the success ladder and need a boost, Crowds On Demand is just another tool in the box, if you can get around the ethical dilemma.
Help Support This Blog
Friday, November 6, 2015
Yes, You Can Hire A Fake Crowd
Labels:
Crowds On Demand,
fake crowd,
screaming fans
Thursday, November 5, 2015
Adele Sets A Record For Downloads
Who says that downloads are dead?
That's not the case for Adele's new song "Hello," which set the record for most downloads sold in a weekin the US at 1.11 million. It's the first song ever to sell that many in week since Nielsen began tracking digital and physical singles in 1991.
Not only that, the song has set records for downloads, streams and airplay in the UK and Europe, so the girl must be doing something right.
Plus the song is already #1 in the US and 14 other countries around the world.
One of the more interesting facts about Adele's past and current success is that she continues to defy the punditry of music industry analysts who insist that physical and download sales will never sell in great numbers again.
Adele's last album 21 sold in excess of 28 million worldwide, while those in the business said that there would never be another album that would ever sell more than 2 to 3 million again.
The same was said for downloads, but yet "Hello" is being purchased in record numbers at the same time as it's being listened for free online and on radio.
Many claim that Adele's popularity is the fact that she's the "anti-Lady Gaga/Beyonce/Ariana Grande, etc", but she's also managed to cross over from the usual teens that buy pop music to a much older crowd as well. Sometimes lack of controversy works in your favor.
It should be interesting to see how well her new album 25 sells when it's released.
That's not the case for Adele's new song "Hello," which set the record for most downloads sold in a weekin the US at 1.11 million. It's the first song ever to sell that many in week since Nielsen began tracking digital and physical singles in 1991.
Not only that, the song has set records for downloads, streams and airplay in the UK and Europe, so the girl must be doing something right.
Plus the song is already #1 in the US and 14 other countries around the world.
One of the more interesting facts about Adele's past and current success is that she continues to defy the punditry of music industry analysts who insist that physical and download sales will never sell in great numbers again.
Adele's last album 21 sold in excess of 28 million worldwide, while those in the business said that there would never be another album that would ever sell more than 2 to 3 million again.
The same was said for downloads, but yet "Hello" is being purchased in record numbers at the same time as it's being listened for free online and on radio.
Many claim that Adele's popularity is the fact that she's the "anti-Lady Gaga/Beyonce/Ariana Grande, etc", but she's also managed to cross over from the usual teens that buy pop music to a much older crowd as well. Sometimes lack of controversy works in your favor.
It should be interesting to see how well her new album 25 sells when it's released.
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
5 Qualities Of A Memorable Post Graphic
When you post to Facebook or Twitter, your engagement goes up about 30% or more (depending upon the study you read) if you add a graphic. The problem is that most graphics aren't that compelling, so the effect is diminished.
It turns out that a picture isn't exactly worth a thousand words as the old adage says. In fact, it's worth exactly 84.1 words, which is the number of words it takes people to describe an image, according to cognition expert Alan F. Blackwell. That said, visuals are much more memorable than words, which is why it's best to take care when choosing one.
There's a great article on thenextweb that describes this in more detail, but here are the 5 qualities of a memorable graphic in a nutshell.
This is something that I'm going to be placing more emphasis on in the future, and perhaps it's something that you should consider in your posts as well.
It turns out that a picture isn't exactly worth a thousand words as the old adage says. In fact, it's worth exactly 84.1 words, which is the number of words it takes people to describe an image, according to cognition expert Alan F. Blackwell. That said, visuals are much more memorable than words, which is why it's best to take care when choosing one.
There's a great article on thenextweb that describes this in more detail, but here are the 5 qualities of a memorable graphic in a nutshell.
1. Harmonious colors. Colors schemes that are natural and work together are the most memorable.
2. People expressing emotion and interacting. Some objects can also be memorable, but landscape images are largely forgettable.
3. Prior knowledge of the subject. Aesthetically pleasing images aren't very memorable.
4. Infographics are memorable, but graphs aren’t. Musicians aren't likely to do many graphs though, and that's a good thing.
5. Multiple images reinforces the point. In other words, a variety of images is better than just a single image.The graphic on the left incorporates 3 of the 5 qualities just mentioned. The colors are harmonious, we all know what a brain looks like so there's prior knowledge, and there are multiple images (the brain overlaid with the skull x-ray). It's perhaps not the best example of the ideal graphic, but it does capture your attention.
This is something that I'm going to be placing more emphasis on in the future, and perhaps it's something that you should consider in your posts as well.
Labels:
Alan F. Blackwell,
graphic,
infographic,
memorable graphic,
The Next Web
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
How Radio Airplay Compares To Streaming
Many people have a difficult time getting their heads around the fact that a million streams or views just isn't that much in our new Music 4.0 age. A minor hit starts at around 50 million and a major hit is in the hundreds of millions.
1 million isn't that much when it comes to radio either, so take at traditional terrestrial radio for a second and see how it stacks up to streaming.
There are 15,730,000 people in New York City, and Artibitron estimates that a station like Z100 (currently the #1 station in the market) reaches at least 0.01% at any given moment (it's probably 5 times that actually). That's 157,000.
If the station plays a song 5 times a day (not uncommon for a song in rotation), that's 157,000 x 5 = 785,000 listens a day.
If the station plays the song for 2 weeks, that's 785,000 x 14 days = 10.99 million listens from just this one station.
There's probably at least one other station in the market playing the song, so that's 10.99 million x 2 = 21.98 million listens.
If the song is playing in New York, it's probably playing in the top 25 markets as well, which means 21.98 million x 25 = 549.5 million listens.
That's the equivalent of almost 550 million streams, but unlike streams, the artist didn't get paid for a single one of the radio listens (the songwriters got paid though).
Keep in mind that the number of plays above aren't even for a big hit (double the number of plays per day at least) and don't include the ratings for the number 1 station (at least by a factor of 5 in New York City).
You can see why our perceptions of a million are a bit skewed. When it comes to sales, yes, a million is a big deal, but it's not the same scale when judging plays, streams or views.
1 million isn't that much when it comes to radio either, so take at traditional terrestrial radio for a second and see how it stacks up to streaming.
There are 15,730,000 people in New York City, and Artibitron estimates that a station like Z100 (currently the #1 station in the market) reaches at least 0.01% at any given moment (it's probably 5 times that actually). That's 157,000.
If the station plays a song 5 times a day (not uncommon for a song in rotation), that's 157,000 x 5 = 785,000 listens a day.
If the station plays the song for 2 weeks, that's 785,000 x 14 days = 10.99 million listens from just this one station.
There's probably at least one other station in the market playing the song, so that's 10.99 million x 2 = 21.98 million listens.
If the song is playing in New York, it's probably playing in the top 25 markets as well, which means 21.98 million x 25 = 549.5 million listens.
That's the equivalent of almost 550 million streams, but unlike streams, the artist didn't get paid for a single one of the radio listens (the songwriters got paid though).
Keep in mind that the number of plays above aren't even for a big hit (double the number of plays per day at least) and don't include the ratings for the number 1 station (at least by a factor of 5 in New York City).
You can see why our perceptions of a million are a bit skewed. When it comes to sales, yes, a million is a big deal, but it's not the same scale when judging plays, streams or views.
Labels:
Arbitron,
Music 4.0,
radio airplay,
streaming royalties
Monday, November 2, 2015
Superstars Account For Less Than You Think
Most of us think that only the top 1% in music, the superstars, make most of the money.
Well, they certainly do when you take touring and merch into consideration, but not when you look at sales and streams, which will surprise many industry naysayers.
Rockonomic did a recent study based upon Nielsen's 2014 music report and found the following:
It seems that the music business is a lot more democratic than we give it credit for. Artists and bands should take heart in the fact that there appears to be plenty of room for other music besides what comes from the superstars.
Well, they certainly do when you take touring and merch into consideration, but not when you look at sales and streams, which will surprise many industry naysayers.
Rockonomic did a recent study based upon Nielsen's 2014 music report and found the following:
- The Top Ten CD albums account for only 6.624% of total CD Album Sales.
- The Top Ten Digital Tracks account for only 3.759% of total Track Sales
- The Top Ten On-Demand (Stream) Tracks account for just 0.98% of total Track Streams.
It seems that the music business is a lot more democratic than we give it credit for. Artists and bands should take heart in the fact that there appears to be plenty of room for other music besides what comes from the superstars.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)