Just as an example, this kid has over 40 million views for his lip-sync of Katy Perry's "Teenage Dream."
Up until now most record labels would let a lip-sync like this one slide or at worst issue a take-down notice where YouTube or the posting service would delete it. However, the new bill would take the penalty a new level, like up to five years in prison, even if you're not making any money!
There are several schools of thought on this:
* From the record label: "This is a copyright violation. They're illegally using our song without paying us."
* From the Music 3.0 artist: "This is great promotion. Fans like my song enough to make like they're singing it."
* From the fan: "I'm just having a little fun. I'm not making any money on this and I'm not hurting anybody."
Which one do you agree with?
-----------------------------------
Help support this blog. Any purchases made through our Amazon links help support this website with no cost to you.
You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.
Check out my Big Picture blog for daily discussion of music, recording, and production tips and tricks.
You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.
Check out my Big Picture blog for daily discussion of music, recording, and production tips and tricks.
1 comment:
Is making lip sync videos illegal the primary reason for this bill, or just a negative consequence? The way I see it is the 'artists' get free advertising, fans have fun, Youtube and who ever get to sell more advertising. The only people getting hurt are the drag queens and other socially unusual people.
Post a Comment