Reznor described the reason for his newly minted agreement with Sony Music recently with David Byrne:
"In the last tour, we're playing Prague, we're walking around and playing that night at Prague. But I see flyers up for Radiohead playing the same place we're playing, but six months from now. And I walk into the record shop, and there isn't a section that says Nine Inch Nails. And there's no kind of presence that we're even there.
And I start to realize, the last few years all we've done... you know Mr. Twitter Bigshot with my bunch of followers right, but it's preaching to that choir of people that are important, but it's that camp. The world's become so fragmented, you can tune into what you like, and a lot of things don't break though that, or cross over.
And we're literally putting our records out on our own, and not using the labels. And I don't know what the cool record shop in Prague is, and I don't know the good blog that comes out of there that I can give some attention to. And I don't really want to do that, but there's a part of me that can't stop, so I get obsessed and I start thinking about marketing and I think, 'there's other people I can hire that can market this stuff, but no one else can write the songs I can write.'
The great part of self-releasing has been controlling your own destiny. Nobody having any approval. Finishing a song at midnight and putting it out the next day. Getting fans excited with no leak, because you have the only copy, and you uploaded it and you hit publish. And wow, that's fun, it felt great particularly after a long career in the weirdness of labels.
But to answer your question, it was to have a team of people that are better at that than I am, worldwide. That felt like it was worth slicing the pie up, monetarily, but our main agenda of the moment was to make people aware of it in the right context versus a little more money we might or might not make. And that's what it came down to, and so far, it's been pleasantly pleasant, actually having people that know what they're talking about and having a team, that's nice."
Now I don't want to come off as an apologist for the major labels because I'm far from it. I believe that until you're at a point in your career when you have some leverage, it's best to stay away from a label and do as much as you can yourself. Signing too early does an artist no good. But if you have a measure of success, that means that you can certainly be in a position for not only a better deal, but more attention from the label as well.
Not only that, after doing so much of the grunt work yourself, you're so much better at determining if the label is doing a good job or not, and helping them to do the best they can. It can be a win-win under the right circumstances.
-----------------------------------
Help support this blog. Any purchases made through our Amazon links help support this website with no cost to you.
You should follow me on Twitter for daily news and updates on production and the music business.
Check out my Big Picture blog for discussion on common music, engineering and production tips and tricks.
1 comment:
Interesting!
I've told several artists about Trent's approach to sales that you outlined in Music 3.0.
It's definitely interesting to see him head back the major label route, though I think for up-and-coming acts, or just an act that wants to do a better job of diversifying its offerings to fans, Trent's $5 mp3 to $300 coffee table book approach still has strong merit.
We definitely can't forget that he's already *famous* and can leverage the skill set of the major label to good effect but that's all based on his existing successes.
His other DIY model will, I think, still be a very useful model for hard working non-superstar acts, until they get to a point where they can't handle the complexity of supporting the marketing themselves anymore.
Post a Comment